PROTEGE 3.4.8 FREE DOWNLOAD

Sign up using Email and Password. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service , privacy policy and cookie policy , and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies. Sign up using Email and Password. OK, I’ve added an answer. Email Required, but never shown. Now, even though you can do this using SWRL rules, you can also do this using simple OWL restriction classes, and that might be a better option, because it might work with more reasoners.

protege 3.4.8

Uploader: Mezicage
Date Added: 28 April 2016
File Size: 23.65 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 82459
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service. Anima 30 1 6.

Some things you can even do in a hybrid way: I’ve included the ontology in Orotege format toward the end of this answer. By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

I use protege 3. BloodSugar ] ; rdf: Now, if you you don’t want to make that an equivalent class axiom, you can use a general axiom like the following.

  MOBILE COMPUTING JOCHEN SCHILLER EBOOK FREE DOWNLOAD

Sign up using Facebook. Could anybody help me?

Can you see any exception while trying to activate the Jess tab? Sign up or log in Sign up using Google. Have it worked before for you?

Protégé 3.4.8 and Windows 10

This is the closest to the SWRL version, since anything that is a blood sugar and has a level in the specified range will be classified as a high blood sugar, but it’s still possible that there are other high blood sugars, too.

Does not create exception. Ontology with Rules prefix: By using our site, you acknowledge that you have read and understand our Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policyand our Terms of Service.

There are lots of options. It is the first time I try to work with the Jess.

protege 3.4.8

What reasoner are you using to evaluate the SWRL rules? Post as a guest Name.

protege 3.4.8

Sign up using Facebook. Post as a guest Name. Sign up using Email and Password. Does anyone know if jess still works in Protege? Your question is pfotege bit unclear, and I’m not sure whether there are just typographical errors, or if there are genuine modeling errors. Anima Glad to hear it!

  ZIKLAG BOYZ FREE DOWNLOAD

Maven Repository: e » protege »

Post Your Answer Discard By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Stack Overflow works best with JavaScript enabled. Sign up or log in Sign up using Google.

protege 3.4.8

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of serviceprivacy policy and cookie policyand that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies. Using an Equivalent Class Axiom You can simply say pprotege using the class names that I’ve been using in mine ontology: I dont know what end wher is the problem?!!!!!

Using a Subclass Axiom Now, if you you don’t want to make that an equivalent class axiom, you can use a general axiom like the following. We’re having prtege same result, but with an exception creating the rule engine.